Why Was an Oregon Man Jailed for Collecting Rainwater?

Last updated: June 29, 2026

If you have searched “Oregon man jailed for collecting rainwater,” here is the short answer: yes, an Oregon man named Gary Harrington really did serve jail time in a case connected to rainwater — but the headline leaves out almost everything that matters. The story is trending again as it recirculates on social media, and it is one of the most misunderstood criminal cases in the United States. Harrington was not jailed for putting a barrel under his gutter; he was convicted of illegally diverting and impounding nearly 13 million gallons of water behind large dams without the water-rights permits Oregon law requires. This guide explains exactly what happened, why it is trending, and how the US jail system handled it.

Who is Gary Harrington?

Gary Harrington is a landowner from Eagle Point, in Jackson County, southern Oregon. He owned roughly 170 acres of rural property. In the late 1990s and 2000s he built a system of dams across drainage channels on his land, creating three sizeable reservoirs — two behind dams about 10 feet tall and one behind a dam roughly 20 feet high. Together these ponds held an estimated 13 million gallons of water. Harrington argued that the water fell as rain and snow on his own property and was therefore his to keep, a belief that became the heart of his long dispute with the state.

What actually happened

Under Oregon’s “prior appropriation” water law — a doctrine that dates back to a 1925 statute — nearly all surface water in the state, including rain and snowmelt that drains into channels and streams, is treated as a public resource. Using or storing large quantities of it generally requires a permit from the state Water Resources Department, even when the water lands on private land. Harrington had at times held permits, but the state determined his reservoirs diverted water from a tributary system and revoked or denied the rights; a 2007 ruling found his large reservoirs unlawful.

When Harrington continued to impound the water, prosecutors charged him with nine misdemeanor counts tied to violating Oregon’s water code. In 2012 a Jackson County court convicted him and sentenced him to 30 days in jail and a fine of about $1,500. He reported to the county jail to serve the sentence, maintaining throughout that he had done nothing wrong.

The Harrington case originally made national news in 2012, but it resurfaces online every few years whenever a viral post frames it as “government jails man for collecting rainwater.” Search interest in the phrase has spiked again recently as the story circulates on social platforms, which is why so many people are now asking whether it is true. It is a textbook example of an old, real case being re-shared without its context — accurate in its bare facts, badly distorted in its framing.

The rain-barrel myth vs. the facts

The viral version suggests Oregon throws people in jail for catching rain in a barrel. That is not what happened, and it is not the law. Collecting rainwater from a rooftop into barrels or cisterns for garden and non-potable use is legal in Oregon and is actively encouraged in many parts of the state. Harrington’s case was different in scale and method: he built engineered dams that intercepted and stored millions of gallons flowing through natural channels, water that under state law belonged to the public and downstream users. The case is better understood as a water-rights and dam-permitting dispute than a “rain barrel” prosecution. Recognizing that distinction is what separates the myth from the documented record.

How US jail sentences like this work

This case is also a useful window into how minor sentences are handled in the US system. In the United States there is a meaningful difference between jail and prison. County jails, run locally by a sheriff, hold people awaiting trial and those serving short sentences — typically under one year — usually for misdemeanors. State prisons and the federal Bureau of Prisons hold people serving longer terms for felonies. Harrington’s 30-day misdemeanor sentence is exactly the kind of short term served in a county jail rather than a state penitentiary; in Oregon that means a facility such as a county jail, not the federal Federal Correctional Institution Sheridan, which is reserved for federal offenders. You can read more about how Oregon county facilities operate on our pages for the Washington County Jail and other local jails. Misdemeanor convictions like Harrington’s also commonly involve fines, and in many cases probation, rather than long-term incarceration.

Where the case stands

Harrington served his jail sentence and said at the time that he intended to appeal his conviction, continuing to argue that he had a right to the water on his own land. The case remains widely cited in debates over water rights and private property, but the core legal outcome — a misdemeanor conviction and a 30-day jail term in 2012 — is well established and has been confirmed by fact-checkers including Snopes. Readers should treat newer viral posts as recycled coverage of that original case rather than fresh news.

Frequently asked questions

Was an Oregon man really jailed for collecting rainwater?

Yes, but with major caveats. Gary Harrington served 30 days in jail in 2012, but his conviction was for illegally building dams and impounding roughly 13 million gallons of water without the required water-rights permits — not for using a household rain barrel.

Is it illegal to collect rainwater in Oregon?

For ordinary household use, no. Capturing rooftop rainwater in barrels or cisterns is legal and encouraged in Oregon. What is regulated is diverting or storing large volumes of surface water from streams and channels, which requires a state permit under Oregon’s water-rights system.

How much water did Gary Harrington collect?

State officials estimated his three reservoirs held about 13 million gallons of rainwater and snowmelt, held back by dams up to roughly 20 feet tall on his 170-acre property.

Did he go to prison or jail?

Jail. Because the charges were misdemeanors and the sentence was only 30 days, he served his time in a county jail, not a state prison or a federal facility. In the US, jails handle short sentences and pre-trial detention, while prisons hold people serving longer felony sentences.

Why does this story keep going viral?

Because the simplified headline — “man jailed for collecting rainwater” — is striking and easy to share. The real case is a complex water-rights dispute, but the stripped-down version spreads faster, which is why it resurfaces every few years.

This article is for general informational purposes and summarizes publicly reported facts about a past court case. It is not legal advice.